Saturday, August 19, 2017

Modeling a Celanese tank car

I have always liked tank cars lettered for Celanese Corporation, and want to have a small fleet of them. The largest production category for Celanese was synthetic fibers and yarn, but they also produced chemicals such as various acetyl intermediates, including acetic acid and vinyl acetate, along with acetone, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, and methanol. Many of these products would be suitable inbound loads to Pacific Chemical Repackaging on my layout. (For more about that industry, you may wish to read my previous posts about it, such as: .)
     At the time I model, the largest plant was located at Bishop, Texas, southwest of Corpus Christi and served by the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico subsidiary of the Missouri Pacific. Accordingly, I use inbound waybills from the StLB&M. Several of the MoPac subsidiaries had their own AAR code numbers and separate waybills, including StLB&M.
     There have been a number of commercial models, at least in HO scale, of Celanese cars. Some are reasonable versions, and I have a couple myself. But what I want to talk about in this post is the challenge of doing the paint and lettering for a typical Celanese car that is different from the commercial versions.
     Celanese tank cars pose a challenge as to paint schemes. Most cars were green, but color photographs show a range from dark green, through a kind of pea-soup green, to light green. Some cars had dome stripes, either cream, dark green (darker than body color), or black; other cars had no dome stripe. The company name was spelled out in a stylized script, in colors ranging from black or brown, to light or dark shades of red (sometimes on a white background, sometimes right on the green), and of widely varying size. Here are examples of just two of those variations, in a photo from the Richard Hendrickson collection, obviously taken at SP’s Taylor Yard in Los Angeles, but I don’t know date or photographer.

     Here is another example, in this case an 8000-gallon insulated car, GATX 66287, with a dark dome stripe, possibly dark green or faded black. This photo also is from the Richard Hendrickson collection, now at the California State Railroad Museum. (You can click to enlarge.)

One might conclude that almost any paint scheme with some combination of these decorative elements would likely be correct for some car. And as can be inferred from these two photos, the ranges of colors seen in prototype photos may well represent simple fading in service, as well as possible variations in original paint color. In other words, the car at the right in the color photo above may have originally been the same darker green as the car at left.
     I should hasten to say that I already have a couple of Celanese tank cars. One is a Precision Scale brass car, the upgrading of which I described in a post  few years ago (see it at: ). Here is a repeat of the model photo from that post. The color chosen by Precision Scale is certainly gaudy but does fall into the range seen in prototype photos.

There was also a Celanese car produced as part of the Tangent Scale Models series of three-compartment General American tank cars. Its paint scheme was based on this prototype photo:

The model paint scheme and car number, GATX 1404, accurately mirrored the above photo. Here is a view of my model, with weathering added to the ready-to-run model.

     Since I have the Tangent model with the red lettering on a white rectangle, and the brass one with the lettering on an all-green car. I decided to aim for one of the cars with a cream dome stripe. It’s a striking scheme and would make a contrast to my other Celanese model tank cars. I haven’t decided yet as to the car type I want to model. It might be possible to start with either a 10,00-gallon car, such as an InterMountain tank car, or perhaps the old insulated Athearn tank car, always labeled by Athearn as a “chemical” tank car, though the term is meaningless.
     [Incidentally, if I use an Athearn insulated car as a starting point, the project will become part of my ongoing series on how to “rescue” that model from its shortcomings. If that topic is of interest, you may wish to read some of the prior posts on it, such as:, which is about fixing the enormous valve bonnet on the Athearn car, or one about a project to use the Athearn body for models of other than high-pressure (or ICC 105) cars, which is at: .]
      I will take up the modeling part of this story in a future post or posts, depending on the extent of exactly what I decide to do to create the model. Like any such story, use of prototype information is essential, and I will explore some of that further in the following post.
Tony Thompson

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Produce shipping boxes in HO scale

There are two possible meanings to the title of this post: the individual HO scale boxes themselves, and a suitable representation of a stack of such boxes. I am going to write about the latter meaning in this post. I have several packing houses on my layout, and would like to depict stacks of boxes on the loading docks, ready to load into PFE or other reefers.
     The first issue is box dimensions, and obviously a stack of boxes in HO scale would simply be an appropriate multiple of the scale size of the box for a particular kind of produce. Box dimensions are not a simple topic, by the way, as each fruit or vegetable had its own size and shape of shipping box. But given the size and shape for, say, oranges, a stack of boxes would be easy to model, perhaps with a styrene box, maybe scribed to represent the individual boxes in the stack. I will come back to making these boxes.
     There is also a second issue: labels on the box ends. These were a colorful and distinctive part of the box, and certainly cry out to be modeled. Many fruit and vegetable box and carton labels have been preserved at museums and can be found on-line. Many thousands were still in stock at some packing houses when they closed, and these original labels have been sold by dealers for years, and are still available. If you Google “fruit box labels,” for example, you will turn up a list of dealers in these originals, such as . I myself have bought a number of labels for packers in the Central Coast area of California, where I model.
     But a particular label that you like may be for a slightly different area, maybe the adjoining county, and perhaps the packing company name is not one you wish to use. With modern image editing applications (Photoshop is just one), I would submit that it is truly easy to modify these labels as you desire. I will illustrate with one particular label, for a brand of lemons packed in Carpinteria, California, on the SP Coast Line, but in Santa Barbara County, some ways from the area I model. Here is the original label.

I wanted to change both the name of the citrus association, and also the city. I mostly used the letters already present on the label, but just rearranged them as needed. I also wanted to change the grade of fruit. The California Fruit Growers Exchange, better known under their marketing name of Sunkist, identified two major grades: premium fruit was called “Sunkist” and was shown with the fruit on a tissue wrapper; the second grade was Red Ball, with the symbol in the above label. I simply replaced the Red Ball symbol with a premium-grade image from another label. Here is my result, for use at my Coastal Citrus Association warehouse in my layout town of Santa Rosalia:

     The same process can be used on many different labels. Shown below is one that I really wanted to use, because it is from an actual packing company, Phelan and Taylor, that I model on my layout.

Incidentally, while looking at this label, I should repeat something that was stated in my column about PFE operations in the September 2013 issue of Model Railroad Hobbyist [you can download any MRH issue, or read it on line, at any time, for free, at their website, ]. The point is this: modelers often wonder why packing box labels so often contain images like this one, having  themes appealing to men, rather than to the women who traditionally did the household shopping in that era. The answer, of course, is that the housewives rarely saw an entire packing box. These boxes were seen only by the male (in those days) wholesale grocer’s buyers. The labels were aimed at them, not at housewives.
     The only problem with this interesting label is that I have located Phelan & Taylor in my layout town of Shumala, not in its actual location of Oceano. The simple solution is the same as for the Sea Breeze label, just use various letters already on the label, and rearrange to the new name. (You can click to enlarge.)

Here again, the label now reads correctly for my modeling situation.
     You are entitled to consider me a little compulsive to have adjusted this tiny lettering on the Bikini label, since in HO scale it will be seriously invisible. But I plan to make some full-size copies as decorations for the layout room, so visitors can see the labels.
     As I stated in the second paragraph from the top of the present post, one can readily find the dimensions of various fruit and vegetable boxes. The end dimension (the two shorter dimensions) set the size of the box label, since usually they covered about the entire box end. Then a digital image such as the Bikini label above is simply reduced to that size in HO scale (keeping the file size the same by increasing the resolution in proportion to the reduction in dimensions). Then just duplicate and stack up the images. For the Bikini label, here is such a stack:

These are not HO scale as you see them in this blog, but I wanted to illustrate the idea.
     I have been pursuing this kind of label modification, and reduction to HO scale, for several packing house labels which suit the industries on my layout, and I will come back to some of these additional labels, and to the HO-scale stacks of boxes that are modeled, in a future post or posts.
Tony Thompson

Sunday, August 13, 2017

Waybills, Part 60: more about resources

In the long series of posts I have been creating about waybills, I have alluded in passing to many resources for those seeking more information. Those posts are readily found using the search box at right, with the broad search term “waybills” or the narrower topic, “waybill resources.” The principal post, and one in which I showed essential books as well as the copy I have of a freight tariff, can be found here: .
     I occasionally get questions from modelers about finding still more resources, and I often comment that you need to use your imagination and guess what items might be out there at libraries and archives, or for sale on auctions such as eBay. In fact, browsing eBay for railroad paper can be quite informative. But there continue to be really excellent items of railroad paper that float through your field of view, if you are just attentive.
     I will include here two examples, both originating from the Pennsylvania Railroad, that I obtained in the Pittsburgh area. Both concern switching districts and tariffs, and are endlessly fascinating, at least to me. The older of these, that went into effect March 1, 1955, contains a list of industries, though not extensive. It just covers the Pittsburgh Switching District, intense as that was.

There is a great deal of information in here about switching rates and handling of switching charges between railroads, and not so much of what modelers might like to read, about the industries and industrial districts.
     The second item is also a switching tariff listing, but from 1968. Its cover is shown below, and as clearly indicated, it if for a number of eastern states in which the PRR operated. For this tariff, these were Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.

It also differs in having considerably more information on industries. As is often true in such tariffs. all are listed by city, and all other railroads in each respective switching district. Below is an example page, for Norfolk, Virginia. Note that connecting, joint switch railroads included N&W, C&O, and N&PBL (the Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line), along with NS, which is of course the original Norfolk Southern, not the later entity incorporating N&W and Southern. (You can click on the image to enlarge it.)

These listings are not comprehensive, that is, they do not necessarily include all industries in a particular town or city, only the ones that fall within a switching district. These districts were created by mutual negotiation and agreement among the participating railroads.
     But limited or not, this is a rich source of prototype data. This kind of information is so valuable for the person creating waybills, it is difficult to overstate. I personally work through these books frequently, looking to match shippers with my on-line layout industries, as well as to identify consignees which my layout industries might ship to. For me, it is part of the fun.
Tony Thompson

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Was it “just another operating session?”

I have just held two operating sessions, in the afternoons of August 8 and 9, partly so I could have my packing house for tree fruit still operating. That packer is shut down for most of the year, so I really like summer sessions to involve carloadings there. “Wait,” you may say, “why care what month it is?” The reason is because I always treat an operating session as being held on the same date in 1953. Thus the sessions I just held were handled as though happening on August 8 and 9, 1953. That enables me (or, if you wish, compels me) to follow seasonal produce harvests.For background on this idea, you can read a couple of my previous posts (especially this one: ).
     So these August sessions were fun for me in that I had all packing houses operating. I had also completed some more track ballasting, added some more soil and ground cover, a couple of new streets (as I described in this post: ), and several additions to buildings and industrial areas. I had even added some static grass in a few areas. Here is the hillside across Chamisal Road from the Shumala depot.

     But beyond the layout changes, an additional attraction for me in this session was the chance to introduce several different patterns of freight car movement. I try to vary how things are done in the switching each time the layout is operated, so that each operating session is not simply another set of the same patterns. I managed to do that in several areas in these sessions.
     The first day, crews were Jim Providenza (and observer Adam Palmer), Linton von Beroldingen, Ray deBlieck, and Ed Merrin. Shown below working at Ballard are Jim and Linton, with Linton suitably dressed as a conductor, the job he was in fact doing. Adam was just out of the picture.

Meanwhile Ray and Ed were hard at work too, switching at Shumala. Ed was engineer on this crew, but appears to be directing Ray’s attention to something vital.

     The next day, the crew happened again to be five, Larry Altbaum, Lisa Gorrell, Paul Weiss, Richard Brennan, and Earl Girbovan. Paul and Lisa took turns on the crew with Larry. I didn’t get good photos of everybody, but here are Lisa and Larry, engrossed with a set-out at Ballard.

Meanwhile, the team at Shumala was Richard and Earl, shown here in the midst of sorting cars by destination, usually the first job in this yard.

     These were fun sessions for me, both to set up and to observe, while these capable visiting operators solved the various switching challenges that go with this branch-line layout. There were a few of the inevitable glitches, all correctable (I believe!), and I’m already looking forward to the next sessions.
Tony Thompson

Monday, August 7, 2017

Modeling grade crossings, Part 2

I have shown and mentioned some of my layout grade crossings in previous posts, but several of them were covered in more detail in the post that, logically, precedes this one (see it at: ). I have done all-paving grade crossings, and ones that combined paving plus railroad ties, as well as a couple of them using ties only. The latter type was shown in a post here: .
     I needed some additional grade crossings as I develop my layout town of Santa Rosalia, and I wanted to try a little different approach. For one thing, though prototype grade crossings have the fundamental principle that the crossing is level with, or slightly higher than, the rail head, on a model railroad this is a problem when track is being cleaned (and can be a problem for rolling stock with close underneath clearances). So although some of my other grade crossing are pretty nearly level with the rail, more recent ones are carefully set below the rail height, and I wanted to try to go even a little further with that.
     I can remember seeing some prototype grade crossings that were little more than a few planks laid between and beside the rails to provide a minimally uniform height to the crossing. I decided to try and model some of that kind. The prototype naturally uses thick planks, but I decided to use thin ones, just to keep the planks below the rail head.
     I chose to use scale 1 x 8-inch Evergreen styrene strip, glued down with canopy glue. These were not tightly fitted, as crossings with much traffic would be, but are simply laid between and outside the rails. Meanwhile, I decided to make some asphalt roadways too. For this, I chose Plastruct ABS sheet, which is already a nice gray color, and the thickness of 0.020 inches fell well below the railhead of this Code 70 track. These roadways were also attached with canopy glue. Here is how it looked, for the road leading to the plank crossings, with planks of white styrene. The building you see is the corner of the Citrus Association. This road will be Laguna Street.

The other road I decided to install was the road that runs between my Richfield oil dealer and the Coastal Citrus shipping warehouse. This street is Corralitos Lane in Santa Rosalia. Here is its original look, with the pavement ending near the track in the background. This road is fairly narrow, more of an alley than a city street, and represents the endmost part of a standard street.

     Once the plank crossings were installed, the next step was to paint them a “wood” color. I used Star Brand no. STR-11, Seasoned Brown Wood, as a base color on the crossing planks. I also needed to provide shoulders to the roadways. For that, I used my trusty taxidermists’ paper mache. I have discussed this material before, with its superb fine grain and smooth finish. The one I use is Brandt’s Compound, from Robert Ruozzi of Irwin, Pennsylvania. With that done, here is the project, showing both roads and with the Citrus building removed.

The crossing planks are kind of stark here, too dark a brown color, and will be weathered. The paper mache areas next need to be painted an “earth” color, and I used my usual Rust-Oleum color “Nutmeg” for this. That is the color of the surrounding areas, pending ground cover or soil.
     I also wanted to paint the road surfaces. The natural ABS sheet is not a bad color, but is quite glossy and much too smooth and uniform. I used tube acrylic paint, mostly Neutral Gray, to paint the road surfaces, with admixtures of very small amounts of Burnt Umber and Black. While I was there, I used some natural dirt and a little Woodland Scenics soil and “turf blend” to get a basic ground cover in the area. Some of the natural dirt was rubbed into the crossings. Below is a view of the area at this point.

     The remaining step was careful cleanup of misdirected scenic materials, and addition of street names, as I do anywhere a geographic feature like a road or a creek intersects the edge of the layout. With those steps done, and buildings returned to their places, here is a view of the scene as it is today. (You can click on the image to enlarge it.)

     This has been an interesting variation in grade crossing styles.  I now have a total of 23 grade crossings on my layout, no two exactly alike, though there are only a few general styles. I showed earlier ones in the previous posts on this topic (links in the paragraph at the top of the present post), and this post shows more of them.
Tony Thompson

Friday, August 4, 2017

Modeling highway trucks, Part 5: local owners

In a four-part series two years ago, I described several approaches I have been taking to model highway trucks, both van or box trucks and also semi-trailers. Here is a link to the fourth of those posts, and you can track back through the series, with each post containing a link to prior ones: , if you are interested. In the present post I want to address one particular aspect of such modeling: including local owners.
     I raise this point because so many commercial models of van trucks and semi-trailers are decorated for familiar brands and companies, well-known regionally or nationally, whether Coca Cola or Carnation Milk or Rath Meats or Schlitz Beer. These are fine, of course, and represent, in a way, another angle on the “beyond the basement” feature of a model railroad, suggesting the presence of those recognizable brands even on the little piece of the planet represented on your layout.
     But if you look at passing trucks in your own neighborhood, town or city, you will see that a majority of the trucks actually have local owners, and serve those local businesses as delivery or, in some cases, pick-up vehicles. I alluded to this point in my prior posts, though briefly. Here is a photo of one example, a delivery truck from my wholesale grocer, Peerless Foods, heading up Bromela Road in my layout town of Ballard. (You can click to enlarge.)

And my interest in having such vehicles on my layout is not only to remind visitors of those on-line businesses, but almost more importantly, to serve as a “scenic link” to industries which are not modeled on the layout. These are businesses which are rail-served via house tracks and team tracks, and have to send a vehicle to pick up the cargoes delivered in that way.
     [Before going any further, I should mention that these ideas are by no means original with me. I have shamelessly lifted them from a great article by Paul Dolkos, which appeared in a Special Issue of Model Railroader magazine, entitled “How to Model Railroads of the 1950s,” published in Summer 2011. (That issue is still available from Kalmbach, at their online store: and is well worth acquiring if you don’t already have it.) Paul’s article is entitled “Trucks drive home your layout’s era,” a sound point to make, but more importantly he shows several example of the kind of local delivery trucks I am writing about in this post.]
     Turning from delivery trucks, such as the Peerless truck shown in the photo above, to examples of trucks making pickups, I show below a truck of Ballard Farm Supply, a company which receives a variety of materials and equipment via the house track and team track in my layout town of Ballard, though there is no siding for this business. The truck is shown at the Ballard team track.

     Of course, there can also be trucks from not too far away, even though off the layout, and again, these would commonly not be marked for national brands. Here is an example at my wharf along Willow Lake Road, with the truck backed up to unload. The view is right past the Santa Rosalia depot. (You may wish to click to enlarge.)

     All these examples are conventional trucks. I have also made up a tank trailer for road asphalt, with two different company owners, one on each side (thereby getting two off-line industries with one trailer!). Such a trailer can be spotted alongside the team track in the appropriate town, obviously waiting for this tank car of asphalt to be spotted. The company name here is a familiar regional one, at the Shumala team track.

Below is the other side of that trailer, using a different company name. There was once a construction company with this name in San Luis Obispo county.

The switch crew understands this trailer when they see it, because they have this waybill:

     Each of these ways of using trucks or trailers decorated appropriately for local or regional owners adds to the specificity of your layout locale, and, as in the case of the asphalt shipments and of Ballard Farm Supply, even helps your team track make better sense as a destination.
Tony Thompson

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Figures, Part 7: more on placement

In several prior posts about model figures for layouts (in my scale of HO), I have described some approaches to painting and repainting figures, as well as modifications you can make to some figures (contained in the first five posts in this series; you can use the search term “figures” in the search box at right to find them all). The most recent post talked about placement of figures, that is, effective ways you can position figures on the layout (see that post at: ). The present post extends that discussion.
     One type of group you can easily represent is workmen (or any kind of people) engaged in conversation, perhaps as a break from whatever work or activity they are doing. The scene below is on the freight platform of my SP depot at the layout town of Ballard.

     And of course you can always add an obvious bystander, observing the work (I had a neighbor once who loved to repeat the saying, “I love work. I could watch it for hours.”) The observer, or a supervisor, watching the work is a common situation. In the photo below, the supervisor, holding a clipboard, stands at right. You may note that one of the workmen is African-American, as is almost always the case in photos of groups of SP workmen. This scene is at my engine terminal in Shumala, with details described in my recent article in Model Railroad Hobbyist (August 2017 issue).

     Below is another grouping, at the Shumala depot on my layout. This depot, incidentally, is scratchbuilt, and its design and construction,, following actual SP depot plans, was described in one of my columns in Model Railroad Hobbyist, the issue for November 2012 ; you can read any issue on line, or download it for free, any time at their website, which is at: . These two workmen are handling cargoes unloaded on the freight platform of the depot. The figure on the right is the one I showed being painted in Part 5 of this series (at: ).

     Finally, I showed a grouping at my Shumala tavern, the Dolphin and Anchor, in the previous post (link provided in the first paragraph of the present post). The key to this scene, as mentioned in the previous post, is the picnic tables. Here is a view of one from above.

I have since rearranged the grouping shown previously, with added sitting as well as standing figures. I want the tavern to be enjoying a full group of customers. 

     These scenes are intended only to suggest ideas for effective figure placement. My layout has none of the standard “cute” scenes, such as a police car pulling over al motorist, but instead concentrates on attempting to show everyday people doing everyday tasks. For me, it makes for a more realistic layout flavor.
Tony Thompson

Saturday, July 29, 2017

My latest column in MRH

As part of the ongoing series of columns with the series title “Getting Real,” by several columnists including me, in the on-line magazine Model Railroad Hobbyist, I have a contribution in the current issue for August 2017. Like all issues of MRH, you can read it on line or download it, for free, at any time at their website, .
     This column is about engine-terminal details. Readers of this blog will realize I have been writing multiple posts on parts of this topic, for example on modeling of blue flags (see my concluding post in a short series at this link: ). I also wrote a longer series of posts about the  excellent kit produced by Banta Modelworks for the SP roundhouse at Port Costa, California (see for example: ).
     Perhaps a more interesting part of my MRH article was the coverage of work carts used by workmen at SP engine terminals. I included a whole bunch of prototype photos, and for flavor here is still another such photo, from the John W. Barriger National Railroad Library photo collection at the St. Louis Mercantile Library, image SP 1168a. It was taken at an SP roundhouse, which looks very much like the one at Taylor Yard in Los Angeles.

Note all the work carts lined up in the foreground, each slightly different from the next, with flat or rounded tops, different hand rails, some with hoses, and different in length. Here is a closer view of those same carts in the right foreground of the photo above.

     My blog posts about how I built a variety of carts are available via the concluding post in that series, which can be found at the following link: . I am in the process of building more of these carts.
     I also enjoyed developing some of the other details described in the column. Some of these, as I mentioned above, have been covered in my blog posts (links are supplied in the article, to connect to those posts). Some other details, such as ladders, have not been addressed in the blog.
     But probably my favorite project, one I had been meaning to do for some time, was the fire equipment cabinet. I knew that SP attached these cabinets to many structures, and I had seen something similar in model form on Bill Darnaby’s Maumee Route layout. But preparation of the MRH column drove me to finally dig out some SP photos of this equipment, and of course build a model. I enjoyed building it, and I will probably need to do a second one for the forthcoming sand house at Shumala.
     Once again, the deadline for another column in the MRH series led me to pull together several ongoing and planned projects, and it was fun to get all those details completed. Once again, if you haven’t seen my column or even the August issue yet, I recommend it.
Tony Thompson

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Waybills, Part 59: more on op session set-up

Setting up my layout for an operating (or “op”) session requires more time and effort than might be evident. Most action on my layout is switching, and I described how I identify industry needs for cars (inbound or outbound) in a post some time back, and I still use the schedules shown there (that post is at: ). I have gone beyond that basic starting point to describe the general process by which I survey the layout prior to an operating session, and proceed to set it up for the next one (see that post at: ). In this post I want to explain a little further.
     In the prior posts, I explained the generation of waybill needs, either from existing waybills on file, or newly created ones for specific needs. What I didn’t get into was the criteria for selection of cars to add to an operating session. The key to doing so is a document I maintain that I call the “Master Roster.” It lists all cars I own, including a few still in kit form or awaiting upgrades to enter service. Cars are listed alphabetically by reporting mark, and entries include the AAR car class for each car, the present storage location (these have to be updated periodically), prior op session use, and identity or source of the car, such as “Tangent ready-to-run” or “built from InterMountain kit,” or perhaps “Challenger brass.” I would also add any pertinent comments, such as car class when known, the slogan for railroads like Santa Fe with a range of car slogans, a lessee’s names on tank cars, or refrigerator cars set up for vent service, or any other relevant details.
     To illustrate, here are a few entries chosen from the document. The “location” is any one of several storage and retrieval locations in the layout room.  (You can click on the image to enlarge it.)

The abbreviation “RHH” identifies a car inherited from Richard Hendrickson. You can see that this kind of roster, provided it is kept up to date and current at all times, contains good information on the car fleet, and for the present topic, collects information on car use in operating sessions.
     So the use of the Master Roster is for locating cars in the place they are stored, as well as giving an idea of prior use. I like to spread the usage around, and see what role I can find for a car not previously used much, or at all. Knowing the inbound and outbound industry needs that have been selected for the upcoming session, I then need to fit cars and their waybills to those needs. Sometimes, of course, the assignment is uncomplicated (Richfield Oil Company tank cars to and from the Richfield dealer on the layout), but free-running cars like box cars are another story. For example, if I need an inbound empty to be loaded at Jupiter Pump and Compressor, and have a C&O box car I would like to work into the session, it may not have a waybill in existence for that industry.
     This is where “stub” or overlay waybills become a valuable part of set-up. (For an introductory discussion of this idea, you may wish to read my post at: .) If that C&O box car already has a pair of waybills in the system, one inbound from a foreign road somewhere, and one which is a Southern Pacific waybill, I can simply add an overlay to that SP waybill, turning a waybill for some other industry into a Jupiter Pump & Compressor outbound waybill. Here is the existing SP waybill for this car:

Obviously it’s an inbound load to the Ballard team track, but the important part is the SP header. Turning to my waybill file, I pull out an overlay for an outbound Jupiter load, one that is headed at least somewhere in the direction of home for the C&O box car:

There are some handwritten marks on this waybill, as on most of my bills; there is considerable evidence that prototype waybills typically contained this much handwriting or more. Now when the overlay is added to the sleeve, this is what it looks like to the local freight crew.

     I use this process most commonly with outbound refrigerator cars. That enables me to direct an outbound load from any of my packing houses, with a seasonally appropriate produce load, for any produce reefer in my fleet, because all have at least one Southern Pacific perishable waybill already. Seasonal produce shipping is something I have researched for my layout locale, and which I always make part of planning for any operating session. You can read my post giving background about that point at this link: . In fact, my most extensive previous discussion about my ways of employing overlay bills concentrated on reefer waybills (see the post at: ).
     With the range of techniques and approaches presented in this post, I have a couple of kinds of flexibility as I set up each upcoming operating session. This adds to the fun for me as layout owner.
Tony Thompson

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Using Weathering Solutions decals

I have described previously some of the interesting products (new to me, if not entirely new to the hobby) that I saw at the St. Louis RPM meeting last month in Collinsville, Illinois. (The post about those products can be found at: .) A very intriguing product I mentioned was the wide variety of weathering decals from Weathering Solutions. Although I show below some efforts using just one of their decal sets, there are many more to be seen at their website, which is at: . I show below the advertisement included with their decal sets, which illustrates the range and type of products.

     The set I decided to try out was set 1105-SLT, “small rust spots.” In my modeling era of the early 1950s, cars were rarely allowed to get seriously rusty and deteriorated, but instead were likely to be maintained before rusting could get too advanced. Thus I only wanted to experiment with moderate rust markings. Here is the decal set, shown here only to emphasize the really large amount of decal material even in this one set.

     After some thought, I decided that one of my covered hoppers in chemical service might well have suffered corrosion severe enough to have generated the kinds of rust streaks available in this set. Accordingly, I chose one to work on. The model represents a car owned by the General Chemical Division of Allied Chemical, and I described its creation in a post last year (you can see it at; ). Here is how it looked at the outset.

     I thought it might be interesting to do the two sides of the car a little differently, partly to see how well I liked the effects. I put the streaks below the hatches, and on the roof alongside the hatches, and also tried to get some rust right at the base of the hatch. Here is one side of the car, the side with smaller rust streaks. (You can click on the image to enlarge it.)

The decals went on as neatly and simply as any good decal would.
     The other side was to have longer and thus more dramatic rust streaks, but similar rusting around the hatches on the roof (after all, whichever side of the car was toward the viewer during layout operation, the entire roof could always be seen). I used longer streaks, though far from the longest ones in this set, and tiny compared to some of the rust streaks in their other sets. Still, this seemed about as radical as I wanted to get on this car.

     This is a neat product, a clever idea and well implemented. It no doubt serves modern-era modelers better than modelers of the 1950s, like me, but still offers some interesting possibilities. I like these decals and will be using them on future projects.
Tony Thompson

Thursday, July 20, 2017

Interesting products at Collinsville

Last month, I attended the Railroad Prototype Modelers meet in Collinsville, Illinois (St. Louis area), as I described in a brief report. You can see that post at this link: . I mentioned in that post that I had seen some intriguing products at the meet, and in the present post I want to say more about them.
     I have already written a separate post about the “headline” new product displayed at Collinsville, which was the new insulated tank car from Tangent. It is the much needed 8000-gallon size, has the much-needed General American underframe, and is another of the superb models we have come to expect from Tangent. My post about those cars can be read here: .) But there were three other noteworthy displays.
     First up was an exhibit of a new 3-D printed model, one that has received some discussion on the Yahoo group called Steam Era Freight Cars. (To join that list, you can visit ) This is an unusual prototype, the Denver & Rio Grande Western drop-bottom or GS gondola. The unusual part is that most of the D&RGW GS fleet was 46-foot cars, instead of the much more common 40-foot length, and the cars had a distinctive curved or “offset” side sheet. A model of this car was produced in HO scale brass for W&R Enterprises, but that car was imported in modest numbers, was fairly expensive, and is now hard to find. The new models from Bonsall Scale Carshops is most interesting. Offered are both a 42-foot car (D&RGW 45,000 series) and the 46-foot car (D&RGW 70,000 series), and a coke rack can be added to the car. Here is a photo of one of the models displayed.

I am not aware of a website where these are being sold, but Corey Bonsall has written about the development and printing of the models, at this link: . I did not manage to find anyone manning the display, but kit boxes were shown, and I believe they can be purchased directly from Corey. If you are interested, his email is .
     Another interesting product was a small motor to throw turnouts, a familiar product of course from several manufacturers, but this one includes a connection to also rotate a switch stand 90 degrees when the switch throws. It looked and worked beautifully. It’s called a “Mole II” and has a simple, effective, and small mounting cradle, and is available with the switch-stand rotation option. It is sold by Proto 87 Stores (visit them at: and do watch the video of this device operating). The photo below, from Proto 87 stores, shows a cross-section of an installation, extending less than half as deep below the layout as a Tortoise machine.

The turnout with switch stand, used at Collinsville for demonstrating the operation of the Mole II machine, looked excellent and as I said, operated very smoothly. Price is reasonable too.

     The third product I found intriguing was a decal system for weathering, from Weathering Solutions (you can see much more of their product line at their website, ). These comprise a whole variety of rust streaks, along with gray and black streaking. The photo below shows part of their display, with a sample car with these decal streaks applied. You can see also the wide variety of sizes and types of streaking offered in this line of decals.

Another example, well suited for modern modeling, is the MoPac covered hopper below, with strikingly vivid rust streaking. (They also offer graffiti decals.)

I bought a couple of sets of these decals, and I am looking forward to experimenting with them on a couple of freight cars. Results will be shown in a future post.
     All these products were interesting to me, and the first time I had seen any of them (though some are not brand new to the hobby). I hope some of them may be of interest to you, too.
Tony Thompson