Almost ten years back, I upgraded an HO scale Roco “Army” flat car, improving details, repairing the deck, replacing the undersize trucks, and repainting and re-lettering. Here’s a link to the concluding post in that series: https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2018/12/upgrading-roco-flat-car-part-3.html .
I then wrote a lengthy series of posts about a wide variety of military loads, mostly armored vehicles, that could move on that flat car, posts starting with the term “Roco flat car,” though loads weren’t restricted to that flat car. If you want to search for those posts, use “Roco flat cars” as the search term in the search box at right. Here's the concluding post in that series: https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2019/10/roco-flat-car-part-10-still-more-loads.html .
On thing missing from my series was a more modern tank. I had used the various World War II vehicles from Roco, appropriate since older vehicles very much remained in use stateside for training during and after the Korean War. But I thought a more modern tank, such as served in Korea, would be good too.
An excellent reference, discussing in detail the evolution of tank design from World War II’s M26, through the M46, to the M47, is contained in Jim Mesko’s book, M48 Patton in Action (Squadron/Signal Publications, Carrollton, TX 1984). That historical material, of course, is presented as background for the M48 tank.
There aren’t too many good photos of the M47 in the U.S. (many were transferred to U.S. allies). Here is a view of one in German service during winter maneuvers in Germany (U.S. Army photo). The hull, suspension, and turret show the extensive differences from the Sherman family of tanks.
Though these have been available in HO scale as ready-to-run models, none seemed available when I wanted one. Instead, I located a Roco kit (their number 5086) for an M47 Patton tank.
The kit is quite simple, a body in two halves, the treads and suspension for each side, and a turret with main gun and commander’s hatch. There are no kit directions, but the location of all parts is pretty obvious. It also comes with a machine gun for the turret top, but these weren’t installed during shipping. I glued the parts together with styrene cement.
Then to make the tank into a load, I needed to add tread chocks from the Heiser set of resin parts, which I’ve shown in a previous post (see that post at: https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2021/07/more-about-vehicles-on-flat-cars.html ). That post also shows the boards applied along the side of the tracks.
Most photos I have been able to find of these tanks in the U.S. show minimal lettering, most visibly the absence of the distinctive white star on the turret sides. So I left mine unlettered. The as-built model above is pretty shiny, and was next given a coat of flat finish.
Finally, I experimented with the new load. The M47 weighed about 48 tons, so could be accommodated on 50-ton or 70-ton flat cars. It’s shown below carried on a 70-ton flat car, ATSF 93459, representing a General Steel Castings one-piece body (Walthers kit), on the SP main line, passing the caboose track at the engine terminal in my layout town of Shumala.
Like a number of armor loads I have assembled before, I enjoyed both the modeling and the chance to learn more about armored vehicles. Previous posts have listed many of the prototype publications in which this history can be found, in addition to the Mesko book listed above. Military loads like the M47 continue to be seen in mainline trains during my layout operating sessions.
Tony Thompson




Here is another loading diagram reference for your tank load - https://armytransportation.tpub.com/TR0690/TR06900086.htm
ReplyDeleteThank you, very interesting and specific.
DeleteTony Thompson
Artitec also make a very nice model of the M47, although it is not currently in stock at the moment:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.artitecshop.com/en/m47.html
Jim Eager
modelingthejointline.blogspot.com
Turret should be reversed with main gun facing over rear deck
ReplyDeleteCharles Liggett
Hi Tony, my 2-Cents regarding loading of tanks and related stuff: the barrel is (usually) in the backwards position during travel to reduce overal length so 2 tanks can be loaded on one car (weight permitting) while loading is done with barrel pointing forward to give the driver more headroom as can be seen in your photo and also that the driver has a clear view of the barrel so it will not touch anything. Also, the barrel has to be fastened with a special device so the turret cannot move in transit (item M in the diagram in the url in the first post). A more important point is that your model lacks any tiedowns (item L in the url) as these are more important in keeping the tank in place than wood blocks. Besides this little nitpicking great model and keep up with good work !
ReplyDeleteGood point about reversing the turret. I just checked and the M47 had a fold-up barrel travel rest and lock mounted on the rear deck. On tanks without one wire rope was typically used.
ReplyDeleteAnother reason for securing the tube was to prevent the turret from rotating in transit, which would have predictably disastrous results.
Jim Eager
modelingthejointline.blogspot.com
Thanks for the reminders. I didn't check on barrel orientation for shipping on newer tanks. The older ones were shipped barrel forward. I do have a late-1950s loading diagram showing barrel forward, so don't know what was most common.
DeleteTony Thompson
I have now consulted the October 1953 AAR book of loading diagrams for tanks, as described in my post of February 27 (see it at: https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2026/02/a-note-on-shipping-of-tanks.html ). In that post, I show that my model with turret gun forward does in fact conform to the loading diagram.
DeleteTony Thompson