Waybills, Part 128: more weight stamps

I  have written before about weight agreements, but not recently, so here is a summary. Railroad cargoes were mostly billed by weight (there was also a carload category, covering, for example, a full hopper of coal). But the considerable majority of weight-billed loads were not weighed on a scale. Instead, weight agreements were in force. 

For example, a shipper of floor wax might know that a case of wax bottles weighed 48 pounds. Then the number of cases in a load could simply be counted and multiplied by 48 to get total weight. This was all certified by a regional Weighing and Inspection Bureau or WIB.

North America was divided up into regions, under the authority of Freight Associations or groups of associations. The map below shows the associations, some of which supervised a single WIB, but in other areas, several associations might cooperate to supervise one WIB. I have previously discussed the WIB territories (see the post at: https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2021/05/waybillls-part-85-more-on-weight.html ).

Superimposed on the map below in green is a single WIB, the Western WIB, the territory of which matched that of the Western Trunk Line Committee (freight association). The map is a 1925 version, taken from page 28 of a book of that date (Grover G. Huebner, The Fundamentals of Traffic, Traffic Service Corp, Chicago, 1925). In addition to several complete states, included in the green area are the eastern third of Colorado, the upper third of Illinois, and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.

When a shipment weight was certified as part of a weight agreement, the shipper could stamp the waybill with the appropriate WIB stamp, including their agreement number, or oftentimes would simply type the WIB initials and agreement number of their waybill. This avoided a trip to the scale.

Just the other day, my friend Bill Jolitz sent me a WIB stamp he found on eBay, stating that he “knew with whom it belonged.” Thank you, Bill! The stamp is shown below, a typical design for these large stamps, about 3 inches tall.You can see it was made in Chicago.

As is common on rubber stamps, the legend of the stamp is placed on the top of the stamp; in this case, the stamp has a round opening in the center, convenient for the handle.  

Below I show the stamp image, about 1.5 inches square, flipped in Photoshop so you can read it (naturally the stamp is made in reverse, so it will stamp reading correctly). This stamp is unusual in that it does not have an agreement number in the center; I assume it could be written in, and an authorized person then initial it. 

Using a fresh ink pad, here is the image as it stamps now (showing some wear, which is great for our purposes). Note the generous center space for an agreement number.

If one used large enough waybill forms for one’s layout, this stamp could be used on them as-is. But my waybills are quite a lot smaller. I take a scan of the stamp image, remove the background so it is transparent, and set it to a size that will look all right on my small waybills, usually 3/4 inch diameter. (This takes a couple of minutes in Photoshop.) Then it’s easily added to waybills. Here’s an example, pending initialing the stamp and adding other scribbles.

This was a kind gesture of Bill’s, to send me this stamp, and I will be using it on future waybills.

Tony Thompson 

Kit appreciation: Speedwitch 50-foot NP box car

 I have written a number of kit appreciation posts for freight car kits that I have especially enjoyed. This one is about a Speedwitch Media kit for a Northern Pacific 50-foot single-sheathed automobile car, kit K103. 

The prototype is a group of 1000 cars purchased by NP in 1926, the first 500 from Pressed Steel Car Co. (cars 5000–5499) and 500 more from Standard Steel Car Co. (cars 5500–5999). They had a ten-foot, six-inch door opening, 5-5-5 Murphy corrugated steel ends, and a traditional NP radial roof. Below is a builder photo (Haskell & Barker, Smithsonian Institution neg. 5073, Richard Hendrickson collection). The fishbelly underframe is evident.

The NP monad on the door was only applied to cars from Standard Steel Car. Note NP’s typical lettering of the 1920s, with reporting marks, number and capacity data to the right of the door. In the 1930s, NP would revise its lettering to conform to ARA standard locations. By the late 1940s, the monad was no longer applied to these cars, and the word “automobile” was omitted as well. 

By January of 1953, my modeling year, there were 935 of these cars still in service. Here is a 1954 photo taken on the Embarcadero at San Francisco (Wilbur C. Whittaker).

An interesting detail of these cars, barely visible in the builder view above, was the application of the Miner “Ideal” lever-type handbrake. It is shown more clearly in a photo of the model (taken from kit directions). Here you can also see the lumber door, applied only to this end.

In building the car, I chose to apply AB brakes, as would be appropriate for my modeling year. These were retrofitted to these cars in the early and mid-1940s. Here’s a view of the completed and painted underframe. The train line was omitted. 

Here’s a photo of the completed model, showing the car lettering and number matching the Whittaker photo above. 

/

 The roof is nicely rendered as shown here, along with the corrugated ends. 

This model is a nice re-creation of a distinctive freight car. It often runs in my layout operating sessions, both in mainline trains and for local switching on my branch line. I enjoy seeing it at work.

Tony Thompson 

A note on the shipping of tanks

In a recent blog post, back on February 12, I showed my assembled HO scale Roco kit for a U.S. Army M47 tank (new in mid-1953, the year I model). I then showed the model being shipped on a flat car. (You can see that post at: https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2026/02/a-new-armor-load.html .) Below I reproduce the flat car photo. 

 There ensued half a dozen comments to the post (you can see them at the bottom of that post), three of which pointed out that tanks like the M47 were shipped with main guns facing to the rear. You will also see my reply, in which I admitted I had not checked loading diagrams.

It nagged me that I had shown this load without checking a loading diagram book; after all, I have one. It’s shown below, and is clearly aimed at DoD shipments. Note the effective date of the book, AAR Pamphlet No. MD-7: it is October 1, 1953, clearly just right for my modeling era. (You can click on the image to enlarge it if you wish.)

There are two applicable loading diagrams in this book for tanks like the loads I have modeled. One of them, Fig. 90 on page 247, for lower-weight tanks, is shown below; it is rather obviously the profile of a Sherman tank. 

The accompanying description for this diagram states explicitly that guns are to face forward, and that if no gun brace is available on the vehicle, that one should be made with a piece of 2 x 6-inch lumber, secured to the gun with steel banding. And there are period photos of Shermans shipped just this way.

Note also the diagonal tie-downs in the diagram. I have omitted these on my removable armor loads so that the loads are not too fragile in handling, though of course they would be there in the prototype. 

 But the issue we are addressing is not Sherman tanks, but the newer M47. In this same loading pamphlet, there is a separate category for heavier tanks. In that case, diagram 92 on page 253 applies, and it’s shown below. This is very clearly the profile of an M47, with its distinctive long turret gun and rear turret overhang. 

And not only is the gun shown facing forward, but the text in the pamphlet reads thus: “Turret gun should be in straightforward position, and turret lock handwheel and elevating mechanism handwheel, must be wired to prevent rotation.”

I do not dispute that in later years, many different tanks, not just the M47, were shipped with guns facing rearward. I merely point out that such was not the case for the M47 in 1953. 

Tony Thompson  

 

A look back: David Weitzman’s steam book

Today I want to say a few words about a wonderful book I’ve admired and treasured for many years, Superpower, by David Weitzman (David R. Godine, Boston, 1977). It’s descriptively sub-titled, “The Making of a Steam Locomotive,” and that is very much what the book contains.

The dust jacket features an illustration that wraps all the way around the book, of the first “superpower” steam locomotive, Lima’s 2 -8-4 for the Boston and Albany, always called “A-1” at Lima. It’s an 11 x 13-inch book, horizontal format, hardbound, containing just 108 pages.  The jacket foretells the illustration style of the book: just the subject of each image, no background, nothing more. 

The story line is that of a young apprentice, just starting out at the Lima Locomotive Works, who is shown the various components for building the A-1. He even meets Will Woodard, the designer of the superpower concept. I will just show a few examples of the 35 drawings, which can only suggest the power of them in the book, as they often run across the gutter of this large-format book.

An early example is the cylinder castings, shown being examined before assembling the pair of them into the cylinder saddle. The right-hand cylinder is on the facing page, its edge just visible here.

Another interesting example is the foundry work for casting the frame halves. The partial image I show below is the sand casting mold, being prepared in the lower area for the molten steel to be poured into the mold, and the upper half of the mold above it. This is most but not all of this large drawing.

Other locomotive parts were forged from steel. The work making one of the main rods is shown, with a typical modest-size forging hammer. Again, this is most but not all of this drawing.

The last drawing I will show is the assembly of the boiler onto the frame and cylinder saddle, when the locomotive parts first begin to all come together. 

What a book! I have been through it  many times, and thoroughly enjoyed it every time. Of course, I’m a steam-era guy and all that, but the illustrations are so well done, and the processes so well shown, that I think anyone with an engineering bent of any kind would like it,

Tony Thompson  

String charts aren’t new

 What’s a string chart? It’s a way of representing schedules, for trains in our case. The idea is pretty well known in model railroading. It is simply a graph of time vs. distance. The distance is the geography of a train’s run and the time span is that of its schedule for that run.

This is very clearly explained, indeed spelled out in detail, in Bruce Chubb’s excellent book, How to Operate Your Model Railroad (Kalmbach, 1977). The example below is for a notional railroad, running from Easton to Weston, and the train is No. 24. The slanting line connects (from bottom) the departure time at Easton with the times of the stops at Frog’s Hollow and Elbow Bend, to the arrival at Weston.

Thus the slope of the line is the average speed. The times in such a chart can come from, or be the basis for, a working timetable. When a complete schedule of trains is represented in this way, the advantage of a string chart is that it visually shows all trains in relation to each other, while showing location and duration of intermediate stops. 

I recently encountered an example of string chart that shows the idea is not new. Here’s the background. The Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland, passing under the very steep St. Gotthard Pass of the Alps to reach Italy, was completed in 1882. It is 15 km (9.3 miles) long, at the time of its construction the longest tunnel in the world (today an even deeper St. Gotthard Base Tunnel is 57 km long.)

In 1982, as part of the centenary of the 1882 tunnel, a commemorative calendar was issued, including photos of the original construction and train photos of various eras. What I found interesting, though was a reproduction of the original schedule through the tunnel, expressed as, you guessed it, a string chart. 

Note at the bottom of the image above that the cover and interior pages of a travelers’ guide, in French and German. It can be seen in the pages at right that there were a lot of trains. For contrast, the 1982 schedule was reproduced also, as you see below. Still lots of trains.

I would just mention in closing that most model railroads with any complexity of train operation can benefit in planning as well as execution if string charts are constructed. My point today is that the idea is far from new, and certainly didn’t originate with model railroaders. 

Tony Thompson 

The new Lines West WP box cars

I just recently learned of some new 3D-printed box cars from Lines West (Richland, WI) in HO scale. You can visit their website for information on all current products, at: https://lineswestproducts.com/ . The new kits I was interested in are for some 1916-built Western Pacific box cars and their descendants. Below I will quote from some of R.J. Dial’s very nice prototype research summary, provided for the kit. 

The prototype cars were built by Pullman in 1916, 1000 40-foot cars numbered 15001–16000. As you see below (Pullman Library), they were 40-ton single-sheathed cars with K brakes, wood doors, and arch-bar trucks. They also had a lumber door in the B end.

In the 1920s, WP converted 200 of these cars to stock cars, and in 1931, added 32 more. In 1936, conversion resumed, with another 200 cars converted and modernized. Thus more than 400 of the 1000 original cars became stock cars by the mid-1930s.

In 1937, WP converted 100 of the cars for bulk gypsum service with roof hatches, renumbering them into the 26001–26100 series. The cars had collapsible internal bulkheads to contain the cargo. In 1942, 25 more were converted. 

Below is a photo (Norman Holmes) of one of the cars in plaster service. Note the large door emblem and the roof hatches near each end, along with  late-style Andrews trucks.

Additionally, in 1936, WP began to convert surviving cars of this series into MOW cars, as their limited capacity made them less suitable for freight service. Many survived in their MOW assignment until the end of the WP. 

The next year, 1938, WP began converting some of these cars into cabooses, the first 38 with cupolas, then 61 more with bay windows instead of cupolas. By 1940, with the arch-bar trucks about to be banned, surviving box cars were stored, out of service, on line.

Lastly, after World War II, there were 35 of the original box cars in existence, and all were converted in 1947 to company stores service. With those conversion completed, none of the original 1000 cars remained as box cars in revenue service. Lines West has done kits for all but the cabooses.

I purchased the kit for the box cars that WP converted to plaster service, since by my 1953 modeling year, all the revenue-service box cars of this group had been scrapped or converted to other use.

When the kit arrives, it has no instructions in the box, but a very nice and complete set of instructions, along with a good prototype history, is available on the Lines West side as a PDF you can download (at: https://lineswestproducts.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Kit-Instructions-WP-Pullman-Boxcar-Stockcar_V6.pdf ). There is also a pretty good YouTube video covering boxcar assembly; it can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9TNVrBRFJE .

The parts are extremely nice. The photo below shows the car body (note the several internal bulkheads, avoiding a problem which can occur with 3D-printed models: warpage. At lower left is the very nice underframe, with all brake gear and piping installed (the modeler will need to add brake rodding). The floor is slightly warped, as you can see, but is flexible and when snapped into place in the body, not only fits perfectly but also straightens.

At right middle are the car doors, below them the scale couple boxes (suitable for Kadee #158 couplers) and at bottom center, the roof hatches. All parts are quite nice; for example, the Z-bar braces on the car body are in fact Z braces. A nice touch is the inclusion of threaded brass inserts for bolster and coupler box screws, since many printed resins don’t seem to like being threaded.  

My first step, as it often is, was to place the car weights. As I usually do, I used two steel 5/8-11 nuts. But as you can see above, the interior bulkheads mean that the weights can’t be simply glued flat on the inside of the floor. Instead, they have to glued in an “upright” position between the bulkheads, where they just fit.

Next I began working on the body by starting to place the many grab irons that need to be installed. Starter holes are in the body at all such locations, making this work much more convenient. But I’ll continue with this project in a future post.

Tony Thompson 

Route cards, Part 31: Grading box cars

I have posted previously about this topic, grading the condition of box car interiors so they are suitable for particular commodities. I was recently given a copy by Michael Litant of a Union Pacific employee document for this work, which forms the subject of today’s post. My previous posts contained quite a few examples of the cards attached to cars to indicate their grade, usually to route card boards, thus the series topic above. I list five of these below. 

https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2023/07/route-cards-part-19-grading-freight-cars.html

https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2023/08/route-cards-part-20-more-grading-cards.html 

https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2023/09/route-cards-part-23-varieties-of.html 

https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2023/09/route-cards-part-25-still-more-grading.html

https://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2023/10/route-cards-part-27-back-to-grading.html 

Below at left is the cover of this screw-post UP book, 4.5 x 7 inches in size. At right is the first page, describing the contents. I will be posting the entire contents on Google Docs, but will show a few pages here to indicate the scope. (You can click on the image to enlarge it if you wish.)

Then pages 4 and 5 give a verbal description of the inspection process, referring to the UP grading card, Form 4151-1, which I will show blow. 

Both sides of the card itself, probably reproduced full size at 3.25 x 5 inches in dimensions, are shown  below, pages 6 and 7.   

Lastly for now, I show here a bit more of the instructions including grading specifics (page 9), referring to car interior photos on following pages. The photos are washed out and pretty uninformative, so not presented here.  

The instructions essentially state that the card should be attached to the car with the uppermost side being the type of grade.  Below is an example used card (Litant collection), slightly different in format and listing different commodities than the ones shown above, dated July 12, 1968 and stamped by the inspector, A. Lish, at Pocatello. 

I continue to find car grading an interesting topic, even though it is rarely applied in model railroading. Good to see all kinds of prototype practices, even if we don’t use this particular one. 

Tony Thompson